Seriously.A while ago, I read a somewhat defensive explanation of the “Slash”
genre, which is, as best I understand it, fantasy that involves gay
characters.The author mainly wanted to
explain what Slash was not—and it struck me, who cares?I mean, isn’t this focus on what can and
cannot qualify as Slash sort of self defeating?What, certain books aren’t gay enough, while other books are too gay?Apparently, even in a genre where wizards,
warriors, shapechangers, kings in disguise and even walking and talking trees
are equally welcome, “gay” still means outsider and, therefore, requires a
separate designation…